← All BitStarz complaints

Network fee difference explained; duplicate amount claim not upheld

Network fee difference explained; duplicate amount claim not upheld
OakVector
Player
BTC
0.0001
Aug 16, 2026
I initially thought part of a Bitcoin withdrawal was missing because I compared the requested amount with the wallet display. I asked for the transaction outputs and fee information so I could distinguish the received payment from the network costs.
14 views
3 comments

The conversation

3 replies · Oldest first
In this caseOakVector · PlayerOlivia Chen · Case manager

Public replies from the player, the casino and the complaints team.

Follow the case, without joining the dispute

Replies are reserved for the player, assigned representatives and invited case participants.

Read similar cases
  1. Olivia Chen
    Complaints team

    Please compare the destination output, requested withdrawal and disclosed fee rather than only the wallet display total.

  2. BitStarz support
    Casino representative
    ↳ Reply to Olivia Chen

    The transaction reference and the fee information applicable to the request were supplied.

  3. OakVector
    Player · Author
    ↳ Reply to BitStarz support

    I can reconcile the payment using those details. I do not have a separate unpaid amount to pursue.